Educational Articles

The Meaning of the Blues

by DAVID LIEBMAN

(Introduction to Aebersold Play along VOl. 42)

As an aspiring young jazz musician I had always read in the history books as well as heard from the older masters that you had to play the blues to truly understand the essence of jazz. Coming from my background, the blues was not present except what I may have heard in the early days of rock’n’roll where the twelve bar form served as an important vehicle for artists like Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Bill Haley and Elvis Presley. Why was the blues so important to the history of jazz?

What strikes me as the most important aspect of the blues goes beyond twelve bars and jazz itself. It is related to the universality of the blues feeling.  Every culture, every human being can and does relate to the inherent cry heard in this music. Whether it be an Indian raga, a sad Scandinavian love song (like Dear Old Stockholm) or a song of mourning from Ghana, the feeling is unmistakable and within all of us. It is definite-a hook to hang your feelings as well as one’s beginning musical attempts towards expression. The blues scale we all learn so early in improvisational education can be immediately accessed and used. (By the way, this is not to say there is no such thing as a happy blues-but alas it is more rare.)

The earliest blues singers like Robert Johnson and Lightnin’ Hopkins to name only two  often didn’t adhere to the strict twelve bars that we are accustomed to. They let the lyrics lead the chords, so a chorus could be thirteen or eleven and a half measures in length!! In other words, the story line dictated the accompaniment. This evolved to the more standard call and response pattern we are used to which in an evolutionary milestone combined with European functional harmony (tonic, sub-dominant, dominant). The blues scale itself has an intervallic symmetry all its own of minor third, whole step, whole step, minor third, whole step. The blues scale even works in a polytonal manner by sounding over the three basic chords of a simple blues (I,IV,V). One hears blues scales throughout even non- blues tunes as for example in the work of guitarist Wes Montgomery.

There is a wealth of information to be gained through understanding the blues and by and large, all the masters have explored the form. Some altered it like Bird did in “Blues For Alice” or Coltrane’s “Pursuance” as well as Miles’ “All Blues”-but the essence remains the same. The blues is the first mountain a jazz musician must surmount and this collection will serve you well to begin that journey. Also recommended as you evolve is Volume 42 which features more advanced harmonies in blues formats through all the keys.

Is More Better?: Programming Pop Music At Jazz Festivals

by DAVID LIEBMAN

The following was written in response to a request from Norwegian drummer Jon Christensen for David Liebman’s views on the direction that Molde and other festivals are taking. As such, it fits into the theme of this issue: where jazz is now:

One can be pretty sure that at some point in the adult life cycle, a mid-life crisis of sorts will occur. It’s a time when one stands on the precipice between a life full of accomplishments (at least to some degree) and the impending challenge of how to grow old gracefully. This is when the distance between long time desires and present reality is measured. The anxiety that accompanies this passage of life is notorious and well documented. Sometimes the remedies one applies may be impulsive or possibly even irrational, but hopefully all works out in the end and one’s future probably doesn’t change much at all.

On several fronts, jazz is going through a mid-life crisis. It can hardly be denied that while interesting combinations of eclectic influences are producing some viable new directions, the emphasis on retro and neo-classic jazz suggests a waning of the innovative energy which jazz enjoyed for quite a long stretch. This can be compared to other art forms at similar points in their development: after the necessary and exciting initial burst of creative fire comes a time of absorption, then retrenchment, then hopefully rebirth. This is a subject which can and should be discussed constantly.

However, a performing art such as jazz actually takes place in the real world and demonstrates every day the working out of the artistic process. From the very important standpoint of who is listening and supporting jazz, there seems to be a loss of confidence as to what we are all about, and our role in contemporary culture. This is reminiscent of a personal mid-life crisis.

Specifically, the question is why more and more classic jazz festivals have abandoned their birthright. They have adopted an attitude of ‘more is better’ and show a compulsive desire to have ‘change for change’s sake’. There is a desire to attract larger audiences, therefore having by necessity to offer more and more well know (and usually pop oriented) acts. It doesn’t take a genius to equate mass appeal with higher income potential- although even that is not an ironclad argument given the high overhead of hiring such performers.

Yes: if pure greed is the motivation one cannot argue with pop appeal. But is jazz a money making machine? Was this ever part of the equation? Those who love the music do so because of the need for reasons that have to do with any great and subtle art-the quest for beauty and honesty of emotions combined with sublime thought. Jazz artists themselves are a very unpretentious group of human beings-almost always self effacing and humbled by the music and its legacy. Why are we competing with a completely different life form-that is the mass appeal entertainer?

Those who make the decisions have abdicated responsibility and are giving in to the simple and easy pull of society’s more base instincts, which have and always will be the desire for power and prestige through making money. We who are aware of this shouldn’t let this ‘more is better’ philosophy subsume our ethic. This is happening all over the world!

There will be those who agree with this reasoning but point to dwindling public subsidies and the need for corporate sponsors which predicates a booking policy geared towards mass appeal. This is not the place to detail how, for example, instead of one mega festival we could have several smaller ones spread out over time and place. Or how to keep the pop and jazz field both operating but not in the same venue at the same time. And so on…

It seems to me that with the kind of sophisticated intellect commonly associated with the typical jazz fan and enthusiast (especially in Europe), we could figure out how to cope with the changing situation. But we must be confident in who we are and what we represent. If we doubt these basic assumptions about the mission of jazz and our role in accomplishing these goals, then we are only operating from a weak and continually threatened position.

It’s really simple and, once again, related to any personal crisis of doubt and misgivings one may experience in life. Realize and accept what you are where you come from and what you truly want-and move on from there. Good Luck.

A Short Explanation of the Fusion Movement

THE FUISON MOVEMENT by DAVID LIEBMAN

I was weaned on early 1950’s rock ‘n’ roll. In fact, that was the music that brought me to the tenor sax in the first place. Elvis, Jerry Lee Lewis, Little Richard, the doo-wop groups and of course any instrumentals that leaked through to the hit parade (Walkin’ With Mr. Lee; Topsy; Rebel Rouser; Tequila) made up my first musical interests, followed in my teenage years by the inredible experience of seeing the John Coltrane Quartet live many times in New York City, where I was brought up. So by the time I became a so-called jazz player and served my “apprenticeship” with drummer Elvin Jones and Miles Davis, rock, funk or whatever it was called, was a part of my life. I didn’t particularly want to play that music but I enjoyed it nonetheless.

When fusion became a style to be reckoned with by my generation(early 1970s), it appeared to be a way that we could leave our mark and take the music to a new place. At the beginning we didn’t think about commerciality or sales and the like. We just enjoyed playing rock based rhythms and rode that energy wave, interspersed with improvised lines which were actually quite chromatic in some cases pushing the boundaries of harmony. And of course, the advent of electric instruments and synthesizers, etc., just sweetened the pot. My first real steady gig was with “Ten Wheel Drive” which featured five horns, a great singer (Genya Ravan) and sophisticated arrangements that reflected Broadway and jazz as well as rock. And of course, Miles and his “students” (Mahavishnu, Herbie Hancock, Chick Corea  and Wayne Shorter with Joe Zawinul ) forged new ways of thinking about music which was truly exciting.

Unfortunately, several things happened around the same time that thwarted the movement. First of all, the large record companies saw the chance to sell this more palatable music (as compared to late Coltrane or free jazz which were concurrently happening) and the industry, with the tacit or in some cases enthusiastic agreement of the musicians basically “poisoned the well.” Also, since the style itself was less intellectually demanding compared to be-bop or Coltrane’s style of playing, numbers of musicians who did not have the necessary discipline to play jazz or possibly the talent, could more easily learn the trappings of the fusion style. So the combination of trying to fit the music into a package that was attractive to the consumer along with a lowering of musical standards conspired to in fairly short order put an end to at least the main creative aspects of fusion. Soft or easy listening, “CD101” type music came along to suck up the trappings of fusion but with the energy and creative drive watered down and “slickified” of course. Putting rhythm and blues roots together with pentatonics and blues licks was irresistible, especially if encased in high class productions and so on.

End of story. Fusion exists now as a style with a few musicians exemplifying the best of the idiom, who will play that way till the day they die. The classic fusion period of the ‘70s will stand as a monument to musicians who were trying to break out of the box and extend jazz to other places.

Note: Even the word “fusion” is a misnomer, since all music is a fusion of at least a few if not more influences. I would prefer to call this period, the jazz-rock age, since the music borrowed certain precepts from each area. Of course, therein lies the danger: When you mix two strong elements together, there is the obvious necessity of having to sacrifice some of the principles of each in order to meld the two together. I am afraid that in the case of jazz-rock, something like this happened.

Playing with Your Brother/Sister: Considerations of playing with someone on your instrument

PLAYING WITH YOUR BROTHER(SISTER) by DAVID LIEBMAN

 Jazz is replete with examples of same instrumentalists playing together. Gene Ammons and Sonny Stitt, Al Cohn and Zoot Sims, Phil Woods with Gene Quill, etc. Though my list would probably be top heavy on saxophonists it exists to one degree or another on most instruments. What would seem to be a recipe for disaster, meaning a potential clash of egos has often resulted in great music being played. Given that any performer has a strong sense of him or herself and naturally wants to be the center of attraction when one is soloing, it would seem that the idea of two tenor players or two guitarists playing together in anything more than a spontaneous and short performance wouldn’t work. But the commonalities far outstrip the differences and jazz musicians are in general, very generous in spirit. They also love to be in an atmosphere where there is the need to raise one’s game because of the challenge of witnessing another musician playing great ideas on the same instrument.

Granted that the musicians desire to communicate, the idea of common ground is obvious because only another musician playing the same instrument would understand the intricacies and subtleties that one must deal with. So instead of a competitor, what you have is a brother who understands as you do what things “feel like”.

Then of course there is the inspirational factor. The fact that you can see and hear someone playing things that you may not have thought of in the same musical context before one’s own eyes can be incredibly inspiring. I know that when I play with the Saxophone Summit-Joe Lovano and Mike Brecker, there is a feeling of familiarity and joy when two of us are on the side of the bandstand listening to the third guy play. We will look at each other and say something like this: “Wow-how did he do that…or what a great version of a Sonny Rollins lick was just played, etc.” This is a very warm feeling because familiarity and recognition naturally makes things feel comfortable in any real life situation.

The level of communication and camaraderie is surely intensified when musicians perform together on the same instrument. And for the listener, there is a natural excitement evident in hearing this wonderful musical situation.

Recording Live and In The Studio – Two Sides Of The Same Coin

In light of the economic state of the jazz record business, many artists have to accept live recordings as representative of their work. It’s true that even in the studio situation if the money is tight and time restricted because of that, the recording process is not that much different from live outside of the presence of an audience. I have done many records in six hours or less which essentially  is a kind of live recording allowing no time for use of the studio situation to one’s advantage. But for the sake of this discussion let’s omit economics and assume that you have approximately two hours per tune, meaning for a standard CD length around two eight hour studio days. (This doesn’t include mixing and mastering which adds on at least another day.)

There is an inherent contradiction when recording jazz in the studio. The obvious fact that people can hear the music anywhere, anytime in the world forever certainly puts something special on any recording. The paradox is that we are capturing a moment(s) of musical time and magnifying it way beyond that time scale. Ideally, jazz, in fact any improvisational art, is predicated on being in absolute present time with no past or future impeding the flow of spontaneity or the artist’s ability to respond to what is happening in the moment around them. We cognize musical “spontaneity” as an ideal, as something special. However, spontaneous doesn’t mean that completely new and fresh material is necessarily being discovered, though that exists as a goal for most jazz players. The reality is that we are playing what we have discovered before, whether it be through the practicing process, or by accident, or a combination of events. It is the interpretative aspects of the music in the moment which is the first time event identified as spontaneous. Even in the case of the pre-be-boppers who often would play a set solo with exactly the same notes from performance to performance (like the classical artist), matters of interpretation (meaning phrasing, nuance, etc.) were different every time. To use a metaphor, magnifying a snapshot into a poster can be daunting and in the case of jazz, at least theoretically, paradoxical to its very ethos. On the other hand, why shouldn’t one moment  be as representative of an individual’s playing as another, assuming the artist is skilled enough to be consistent (a skill gained by experience in the studio).

The obvious benefits of studio recording is what painters, writers and sculptors artistically enjoy as a given….the opportunity to refine, correct and change one’s art towards the artist’s vision. It is in the studio where we can actually realize a piece representing the kind of diligence and care an artist should and can give to his work and to the audience. The other reality is that you cannot hide under the harsh lights of the studio where everything is heard to the smallest detail. The studio is a great leveler of talent…everything is scrutinized. However, in our era with technology so advanced, it is possible to seamlessly alter everything about the music to such a high degree that there is the inherent danger of over correction…. a problem of too many possibilities. In other words, if I have the capability of making something “perfect,” how can I resist using it? The sad truth in our era is that a listener cannot be sure that what they are hearing is what was actually played because there are so many ways to alter the past. Of course this is ultimately an individual artist’s decision but a very important one, especially for an art form that prizes spontaneity. Let me remain positive and just say that editing in our time affords the artist a chance to make a truly grand presentation, to present a concept, to mull over details… all of which hopefully contribute to a higher level of enjoyment from the listener as well as encouraging the artist to evolve further.

Though it is less likely that a performer uses extensive editing on a live recording compared to the studio, you can never be sure. Putting that reality aside, recording live is as close as you can get to hearing the essence of jazz….spontaneous-in the moment playing which for my aesthetic is the absolute highest musical goal. What I am looking for when I hear myself is a solo that is technically beyond reproach; ideas that are musically sound and coherent; interaction with the other musicians at the highest level; and an emotional depth that the listener can feel. That is a tall order which is realistically beyond most of us, but represents the highest goal of jazz improvisation for me. Recording live can be a nerve wracking experience because you cannot go back and change or fix things without affecting the very premise of what a live recording is supposed to be.

In summary the challenges of both kinds of recording are many and for the jazz artist it is mandatory to live in both worlds. As I said earlier, because of the current state of affairs in jazz recording, much of what is being released are live recrodings, a reality we as musicians have to live with. But we must persevere in attempting to find ways of recording under the white lights of the studio, using the tools afforded us in that environment to elevate our art.

One thing is sure…for myself and my peers it was the live recordings of Miles, Coltrane, Bill Evans, etc., that were passed around, many of which recorded in the ‘60s, as tenth generation reel to reel copies, evolving into cassettes and finally CDs that had the most effect on our musical development. The Coltrane “One Up, One Down” track live from the Half Note in NYC was a treasure as were various live Miles Davis concerts. “Live at the Plugged Nickel” was like gold (first released in Japan only as a double LP) and I wore out Trane’s “Live at Birdland.” There were some artists like Sonny Rollins, known for not being terribly comfortable in the studio, for whom you went primarily to their live recordings to hear their latest work. On the other hand those of us who saw Coltrane live witnessed first hand a group that was completely different on vinyl than live. (Refer to the You Tube of “Vigil” discussed below).

So what does this come down to? As an artist we have to deal with what is given us in our time. But for the serious listener the only way to really know how someone plays is to hear them live a few nights in succession without the benefits of hindsight (editing). Then you can truly judge themusic. Studio recordings are another, parallel reality to be taken in account on its own merits.

Europe and its Role in Jazz

EUROPE AND JAZZ (written in the 1990s) by DAVID LIEBMAN

When I review the days spent on the road at the end of the year, the percentage of time in Europe far exceeds anywhere else. I would venture to say that this is true for the majority of working jazz artists, even some of the superstars. This has been the case for several decades or more if you factor in famous expatriates like Ben Webster, Dexter Gordon, Johnny Griffin and others. Sidney Bechet, the father of the soprano sax has squares and boulevards named after him in France!! Is it simply a matter of the grass is always greener or that finding acceptance in one’s own backyard has always been traditionally more of a challenge for creative people? Or is it because jazz is viewed as foreign and exotic to Europeans, thus explaining its long appeal. Maybe we should just say that Europeans are just more sophisticated and cultured than us!! After all, almost everywhere you go in Europe there is something REALLY old staring you in the face, especially compared to the World Trade Center or Sears Tower. In my opinion, it is all of the above and more that causes Europe to be such a fertile land for jazz. There is definitely a long musical tradition which besides having provided for the church l liturgy has elevated music making to a high art. On the technical side, jazz harmony derives lock, stock and barrel from the European classical aesthetic with much having been written tracing the common lineage from Bach to Schoenberg. Because of this long tradition, music is considered a necessity in Europe. With the socialist political tendencies that have marked post- war politics, the most important fact of why the arts have continue to survive there is government funding. Pure and simple, there is money to support the arts and though the major beneficiaries are largely opera, theater and orchestras, jazz has received its share of the largesse. Surely it differs from country to country and fluctuates as the governments change but the e mandate is essentially intact. Some co-sponsorship with private companies has risen in the past decade to take up the slack of less government spending. Remember that until recently all radio and TV were state run and these stations had the responsibility to present all forms of culture, from rock to world music, jazz to classical. Finally, the romantic image of the smokey jazz club and the whole jazz culture in general resonates loudly in Europe where the concept of the café as a meeting place to hang out is part and parcel of their life style. To sum it up, I quote a statement that the famous impresario George Wein (founder of the Newport and JVC Jazz Festivals) told me: “If it weren’t for Europe, there would be no jazz!”

The European Jazz Scene

Prior to World War II there was some jazz played in parts of Europe, but it was definitely the post war generation exposed to Bird and the be-boppers, (some of whom came through on tour), who took jazz and began to develop it, at first derivatively, t hen slowly expressing an individual personality. Remember, when one says Europe you are speaking about an area comparable to the size of the U.S., but with over a dozen distinct cultures, histories and traditions. Each country has its own slant on the development of jazz with a distinct way of doing things. Given the rich classical tradition that these musicians were born to and in many cases trained in, you can imagine the interesting and diverse fusions of influences that have taken place there. The Afro-American roots of jazz which we take for granted in the U.S. didn’t really exist in Europe. But what they do possess besides the classics is proximity to many types of world music coming through colonization and subsequent immigration from Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Europe indeed has its own unique circumstances which have mixed with American jazz. By the 1980s there were more notable jazz personalities and styles from many of the countries than previously. Some had come through be-bop, while the new generation was affected by free jazz and Coltrane as well as fusion. By that decade, jazz education was well on its way throughout Europe. In fact, the 80s represented a virtual explosion of interest in jazz with more combinations of European and American musicians. There had always been a tradition of an American soloist(usually a horn player) playing with a European rhythm section. That trend increased during the 80s when even lesser known musicians were being invited to play with Europeans. Finally, the role of independent run record companies became quite pronounced in Europe from the 70s on, especially with the phenomenal success of the German-based ECM label. The European record producer was a special breed: non-compromising, expert in on e or more areas of the music, avid record collectors wholly dedicated to “art for arts sake.” It was through their support and commitment that many American musicians established a reputation as well as a platform to develop their art. With the American a attitude towards commercialism and profit margins so entrenched in our culture, all but a few artists could regularly record in the U.S. Personally, my first two recordings as a leader were for ECM in the early 70s(“Lookout Farm” and “Drum Ode”), and if it weren’t for the great support of several labels over the years, I probably wouldn’t be writing to you now!!

Myself and Europe

Maybe it was fate but even on my first trip to Europe while in college, I connected up with the scene. In June, 1967, I was finishing my third year of college at New York University. My parents gave me $1000, a book called “Europe on 5$ A Day”, a plane ticket and the first night’s reservation at a hotel in London. With my tenor and a few names of musicians I was off. That first night in London I made some calls the moment I got into the hotel. I ended up at the famous Ronnie Scott’s club and met a whole g group of young musicians rehearsing in a big band. For the next few weeks I stayed with saxophonist John Surman and Dave Holland(who would come one year later to New York to play with Miles Davis). On July 17th,the day Trane died, I arrived in Stockholm an d stayed with musicians there for awhile taking part in my first recording(“Och Hans Vanner”-Love Records), with pianist Lars Werner. After these weeks I went to Italy, Spain, France and Copenhagen(hearing Dexter Gordon) playing more than I ever had. This was the first revelation that there was a chance to play jazz after all. My life and its focus had changed forever. Little did I know how many times I would return to these same places over the years!! When I did return in the 70s it was much different with Miles Davis, Elvin Jones and soon my own groups. But it was really in the 80s that I began to seriously interact with European musicians, publish books, teach and record a lot. It has been a continuo us run since then. For me, Europe has been a mecca with a different relationship in each country. I would not be the musician I am without Europe and am eternally grateful to those who have supported me there. Overall, I would say it is the openness, curiosity and above all respect that I have felt from the European public and musicians which have been the main factors. Given the various cultural differences, this has worked greatly to my artistic advantage by having to adapt musically and still keep the integrity of what I do personally. The European musicians in general are less bound to the be-bop culture in the aesthetic sense. It is so interesting to see how the influences of various cultures, world music and the classical tradition have interacted t o create such individual music in some cases. I hesitate to describe the European jazz I encounter as “free”, but I would say that there is a remarkable openness on both the part of the audience and artists to playing in a less traditional manner. Following are my observations of some of the major characteristics of the jazz scene in various countries.

Scandinavia

Overall there are two strains of American influences which are quite pronounced in Scandinavian jazz. Because many expatriates resided in Sweden and Denmark in particular, there is a legacy of be-bop and the sophisticated audience which it engendered over several decades. On the other hand, there is the famous “Nordic” sound first made famous by Keith Jarrett’s recording on ECM “Belonging” from the 70s which used several Scandic musicians(Jon Christensen on drums, Palle Daniellson on b ass and Jan Garbarek on saxophone). This had a major influence on the jazz scene there and in fact worldwide as far as setting the tone of a style. The ECM label in fact has used a studio in Oslo, Norway for years to record many CDs and employed these an d other Scandinavian musicians for many dates over the past decades. Also, there is an abundance of big bands, both amateur and professional who regularly integrate the writing skills of some of America’s best composers: Bob Brookmeyer, Jim McNeely, Mari a Schneider and Vince Mendoza to mane a few. Exactly what is this “Nordic” sound that I have referred to which in turn has influenced American musicians? Maybe it is the long winters along with the heavy imbibing that takes place in this part of the world. In any case, there is a melancholic and stark flavor in the harmonic realm, quite different then the blues tinge that we are used to. Some of the other characteristics area great deal of minor based tonality, a pronounced folk song influence, sparseness of texture, long melodic lines, a lot of rubato phrasing, eighth note based pulse with a sprinkling of uneven meter, and a preponderance of reverb effect used on the recordings themselves. There is a definite and singular atmosphere or color to their music in general. The deepest musical education in Europe takes place in Sweden beginning at the high school level. There are many conservatories and programs in jazz as well as the other arts. For the working situation there is even a government sponsored agency which sends groups out to countryside towns for performances as well as an association of nearly 100 jazz clubs country-wide. The typical Swedish jazz musician is the best overall equipped craftsman around. This is reflected in their ability to play in many genres from free jazz to be-bop to fusion and of course the “ECM” style. They have a long relationship with jazz and are for example proud of the fact that Charlie Parker toured with Swedish sideman back in the early 50s. Overall there is usually some financial support from the government for many jazz musicians. The Swedish audience in keeping with the basic orderliness of their society is usually quite reserved and small in numbers, relative to the population of course. Close to Sweden, surprisingly I would place Finland. This small and rather mysterious country is reputed to have more orchestras and festivals of all sorts proportionally than any other country. I have toured towns with unpronounceable names way in the north near Russia which all have the most lavish and gorgeous concert halls. Again, there is some level of government support and several higher schools teaching jazz. The Finns have a justified reputation for reticence which definitely pervades the typical audience there. But like the Swedes they are very appreciative and fairly sophisticated listeners. Concerning Norway I haven’t as much time there but in many ways it is similar to Finland in that there is a nucleus of musicians more or less clustered around the capital of Oslo who are very active. Specifically, several of the most important musicians on the ECM label are Norwegian: Aril Andersen, Jon Christensen, Terje Rypdal and most notable of all, saxophonist Jan Garbarek. Denmark is a special case in Scandinavia because both in the physical sense(they are attached to Europe’s mainland) as well as culturally, the Danes combine the Nordic and European sense. They are a lively people, very warm and polite with great interest in humanitarian and environmental causes. In general their personalities are a bit looser than their Northern counterparts and more in tune with the American influence. Throughout jazz history, many expatriates have resided in Copenhagen, in large part due to the Dane’s traditionally equitable treatment of minorities. (Dexter Gordon and Kenny Drew were among the most well known.) The Danish are a great audience to play for as they really get into the music. Throughout Scandinavia but especially in Sweden and Denmark, there has been a long tradition of great bass players, ranging through classical, jazz and fusion. It seems that the great bebop bassist, Oscar Pettiford spent some time there and exerted a tremendous influence. In Sweden, American bassist R ed Mitchell lived for many years and was very important to the scene. Contemporary bassists of note are Nils Henning Orsted Petersen(NHOP for short)from Denmark, both Palle and Lars Daniellson(not related) as well as Anders Jormin from Sweden. Since 1985 I have been working with the rhythm section of Lars Danielson(bass) and Bobo Stenson(piano) from Sweden along with Norwegian drummer Jon Christensen. In this group, Jon basically sets the loose rhythmic tone while Lars holds the harmony and time as Bobo and myself dance over this bubbling foundation, often playing lines in tandem as well as blowing in the traditional accompanist-soloist relationship. The music ranges from very lyrical to almost austere in tone as well as some high energy free jazz. There are some Swedish folk influences and even a few jazz standards, but it is all played in the same stylistic “Nordic” vein. We have several recordings out on the Swedish-based Dragon label including a live date from Visiones, the former club in New York.

France

During the 1980s, the typical national French budget included over a 10% allotment for culture, of which jazz was part. This has abated recently but it has not entirely disappeared. Suddenly in that decade there were literally dozens of small and large festivals throughout France, as well as an abundance of record labels and at one time, nearly 200 “jazz” schools. The French have for decades been proud of their supportive attitude towards jazz. Many American musicians have spent time in the greatest of cultural cities, Paris. There was a vibrant Left Bank jazz scene in which expatriates of the bebop era ruled for years including Bud Powell, Kenny Clarke and others. The Art Ensemble of Chicago lived there for some years as did many avant garde musicians. Soprano saxophonist Steve Lacy has been in Paris for nearly 30 years himself. In my opinion outside of the northeastern part of America considering New York as the hub, Paris is the only other logical place to live if you are interested in jazz and its offshoots. Paris, even more than New York is literally a bouillabaisse of people and influences, mainly from the former colonies which results in a tremendous hodgepodge of musical cultures including southeast Asia and many areas of Africa, fro m Morocco and Tunisia to Senegal and other Western African countries. The French truly respond to jazz and enthusiastically embrace it as a people, probably more than anywhere else. It is not uncommon to hear jazz at road stop restaurants or when you fly Air France as you enter and exit the plane. Because of the explosion of government support in the 80s, and as part of their general Gallic pride in anything French, their own musicians have been better supported than anywhere else on par with Sweden. The French musicians have therefore developed quite a bit in the past decades and they have a unique style all to themselves. I don’t intend to denigrate it by calling it vaudeville (a French word in any case), but a lot of French jazz has and almost minstral show quality to it. Maybe it is the theatrical influence from Moliere and the Comedie Francais along with the literary tradition of Flaubert, Stendhal, Baudelaire, etc., but I detect a sincere effort to entertain the audience with the music. The French truly have their own sound. Also it is saxophone-clarinet land to be sure. Along with the oboe and flute, a great deal of the historic development of these instruments is due to French craftsmen. Some say that the elocution of their language causes the typical Frenchman’s lips to articulate in a way favorable to woodwind sound production. In any case, some of the oldest and most popular instrument, reed and mouthpiece manufacturers are in France including Selmer (saxophones), Louray (oboe) and Buffet (clarinet). One particular thing strikes me about the French audience to their credit. Once they are convinced that you are valid, they remain loyal forever. They can be very opinionated, sometimes a bit uniformed and even prejudicial, but if they take you into their orbit you will always be accepted. To the French, being an “artiste” is everything!! For me, France has definitely been the best scene for me, due mostly in part to the recordings and great support I received from Jean Jacques Pussiau, owner of Owl Records. We made seven CDs ranging from West Side Story to fusion to classical and free jazz as well as tributes to Miles and Coltrane. I have had the opportunity to work with the trio of Jean Francois Jenny Clark, one of the greatest of all bassists (recently and sadly passed away), pianist Joachim Kuhn (German but lives in France for years) whom I have known for 25 years and is a consummate musician, and drummer Daniel Humair, who in a sense represents the history of European jazz having begun playing with Bud Powell as a teenager in the early 60s. Well rooted in jazz history, they like to p lay hard, angular melodies with complex harmony followed by completely free improvisation usually at very fast tempos. Also in France, I have been invited often to play with Michel Portal who represents the best in the French tradition. He is an expert an d famous classical clarinet who also plays a sort of free jazz influenced at times by his Basque roots. He is not a be-bopper but plays the horns so well and has such great musical instincts that he is capable of some wonderful moments. In the recent pas t I have formed a trio with a bassist similar to Portal in the sense that he too is a classical expert who among others has worked with Pierre Boulez. Jean Paul Celea plays the bass so well that whatever comes out is musical. The drummer in this trio is Austrian, Wolfgang Resigned, who plays in a very modern and energetic mold along the lines of Jack DeJohnette. This group deals in a free jazz context similar to the first group I was involved with, the Open Sky Trio with Bob Moses in the early 70s. The common thread with all of these musicians is their classical background and familiarity with that repertoire, way beyond mine by the way. Therefore, they begin at a technical point on their instruments that is astounding.

Germany and Austria

With the long and historic tradition so linked with the German culture for hundreds of years, their audience is highly developed and the most mature in the world. This directly leads to the existence of many small and independent labels dedicated to p resenting jazz over the years (ECM,ENJA,CMP).. With the largest market in Europe, their famous efficiency and such a highly educated population, jazz has traditionally done well in Germany. For years there were several full time resident big bands working for the regional radio stations which regularly played jazz. The cabaret and beer hall tradition of German society where people socialize has contributed to a high number of jazz clubs throughout the years, though this has greatly evaporated recently. From the post war years and still, the presence also contributed to the direct influence of American culture-not only in jazz, but pop also. There is one distinct aspect of German jazz which has been evident for several decades. That is the free jazz movement which has continued to exist even after its near disappearance in America. I would trace this to the classical avant-garde tradition of the early 20th century with Schoenberg, Webern, Berg and others of that ilk. Some of Germany’s top practitioners in this regard are Alexander Shlippenbach, Peter Brotzmann and most notably, trombonist Albert Manglesdorf. The free jazz influence was also felt in the former Eastern bloc countries, more so before the end of the Berlin Wall than now. But there are still some festivals completely devoted to avant garde music, while at the same time you can attend pure Dixieland events (a contrast which by the way occurs in almost all of the countries surveyed here). The typical German audience as I have mentioned is the most sophisticated in the world as far as jazz is concerned They are knowledgeable and thought they can be faddish with styles being popular for awhile, then fading, usually the highest level of listening takes place there. They are respectful but let you know how they feel. Jazz education exists in several places including, Mannheim, Essen, Cologne, Frankfurt and Berlin for the most part alongside longstanding classical programs. Overall, with such a large population, high income levels, and in one area of Germany a sort of cultural tax for each citizen, this country has been a major force for the support of jazz for several decades. Austria is much smaller in population than Germany with the main center of course being Vienna. It also enjoys a rich classical tradition which is virtually inseparable from Germany. There are many fine musicians involved in all kinds of projects especially with chamber music and other types of traditional ensembles being incorporated in various mixtures of sorts. The level of musicianship in Austria is extremely high, but in general the audience is not as discerning as their German neighbors. Although I don’t have a steady rhythm section in Germany as in France and Scandinavia, I have had some important relationships in other ways. Advance Music, run by Hans and Veronica Gruber, have published most of my books as well as chamber music. They have been very supportive, especially in view that many of my teaching materials are not commercial or meant for the wider audience. The same could be said for the record company CMP, run by Kurt Renker. I have done some of my most artistic recordings at the wonderful studio that Kurt has in the German countryside along with one of the greatest engineers alive, Walter Quintus. Our latest project is a solo recording titled “Time Immemorial”. The northwest part of Germany (around Cologne) is home for the WDR( West German Radio) which covers both TV and radio. They are well funded and have a full time jazz big band that does all types of creative projects featuring soloists. I have done work there with Jim McNeeley, Vince Mendoza and in an orchestral setting with Bill Dobbins who now heads both the WDR big band and the jazz department at the Cologne Hochshcule. The whole concept of soloing over large ensembles has added greatly to my skills and besides, it is a thrill of a different sort fronting so many musicians. This experience comes directly from my interaction with the German scene.

Italy

There is a natural correlation between the Italian temperament and jazz. For Italians, the energy, joy and enthusiasm of jazz is a natural. The scene as far as musicians is concerned is quite active. Unfortunately, the Italian government(s) do not have their act together enough to subsidize this music at all, nor is there much jazz on radio or TV. This is a bit sad because there is so much culture surrounding them on an everyday level, and there is much support for opera of course. Finally, in the pa st decade jazz was officially recognized by the very traditional university system, which as in most of these countries is state supported, very old and very conservative. The Italian musicians play all kinds of styles from be-bop to free. Besides England and Holland, they have been the most heavily influenced by American jazz. Possible due to their operatic tradition and ecclesiastical music, they definitely have a gift for melody and for some reason the trumpet has been quite popular for Italian jazz a rtists. Some notable trumpeters are Enrico Rava, Flavio Boltra and Paolo Fresu. The Italian audience is by far the most enthusiastic and warmest that one encounters. They love everything usually. In fact, it is hard to separate the Italian life style of great food, wine, high fashion, beautiful towns and villages, medieval art and culture everywhere as well as the mellifluous sounding language from their enthusiasm about jazz, film, opera, painting and the arts in general. For that matter they are equally enthusiastic about gossip. After all, the term “paparazzi” originates with the Italians! They are a most remarkable people and the musicians and audience alike reflect this. Touring in Italy is extremely enjoyable (outside of the frequent transport strikes).I always enjoy playing with the acclaimed pianist Franco D’Andrea, trumpeter Paolo Fresu and saxophonist Maurizio Giammarco among others. Also in Italy I have recorded some repertoire CDs for Red Records and original music for Soul Note. Just to give you an insight into the attitude of European record producers, I quote what the owner of Soul Note, Giovanni Bonnandrini said to me when I asked if a particular project was al l right. He said: “The only thing is that the music be creative”!! (How many American producers would say that?)

Holland, England, Ireland and Spain

All of these countries (except Spain) have in common the large effect of American jazz. Maybe it is language, because even the Dutch are quite fluent in English. In England itself, there is a long tradition of “trad” (dixieland), but there have also been great beboppers and free musicians. London, like Paris and New York is a world city with all the different influences from former colonies and immigration affecting the music. For years, one of the most famous clubs in the world, Ronnie Scotts h as been presenting world class jazz. Jazz education exists to some degree and there have been a lot of notable jazz journalists, books and periodicals coming from Britain. The staid English audience is a given, but they are the most hospitable of peoples, genuinely gracious and polite. The list of notable English musicians is impressive: Dave Holland, Tony Oxley, John Surman, Kenny Wheeler(Canadian but living in England for years) and John Taylor to name a few. The Netherlands is a small and very densely packed country which has an extensive university system for jazz education. The Dutch musicians are highly skilled and very adept at all styles with a wide range from be-bop to free. The audiences are good and have an exceptional tolerance for free jazz which has been widely accepted there. Musicians such as Hans Bennink and Wilhelm Breuker have excelled in this music. One of the biggest festivals in the world runs in the Hague there during the summer called the North Sea Festival. Ireland which is truly tiny in population has in recent times really come up in jazz. They are obviously tied to both the U.S. and England, but due to a handful of energetic musicians led by bassist Ronan Guilfoyle, as well as the strong artistic tradition native to this island culture, the Irish sound is becoming more individual, especially in the realm of rhythm. Spain, relatively new to jazz and more isolated culturally, has of course its own rich flamenco tradition which permeates the entire society there. In both Barcelona and Madrid there are full time schools where hundreds of students of all ages study around the clock. The progress of the Spanish musicians has been remarkable over the past decade. Although they bear some similarities to the Italians and the lyrical heritage, they possess a soulfulness and rhythmic intensity all their own.

International Association of Schools of Jazz

The founding of the IASJ in 1989 was the result of my personal efforts to bring the various cultures together along with of course America and other parts of the world, all with the common thread being their love and teaching of jazz. Currently we have 35 countries represented on every continent and have held meetings in a different school each year. Upcoming are meetings in Spain, France, U.S., Finland and Japan. Over the years I have handed out to all the participants a questionnaire meant to gather various information including how the students began in jazz , their influences and views on a wide range of topics outside of the music. This questionnaire is in reality statistical proof of the axiom that jazz is universal. Pat Dorian and Terry Giffel of East Stroudsburg University in Pennsylvania have taken it upon themselves to prepare an analysis of this data which will is available in the research division of IAJE. Some quick findings offer the following points of interest: -Forty eight percent of those surveyed(256) come from musical families. The large majority had their first major jazz experience between the ages of 14 to 16. Miles Davis(book, video, recordings) was mentioned by thirty seven percent as the biggest influence; Coltrane by 30%. “Kind of Blue” was the leading recording mentioned. Definitely check out the research paper for more interesting conclusions.

Final Words

The fact that a musician like myself, steeped in American jazz and New York in particular, can be fortunate enough to share spiritual moments with so many people from a different part of the world is a testament to the universal appeal and potential power of this music. I honestly feel that the future will see more and more international collaborations for jazz musicians coming from all parts of the world, infusing the music with a breath of fresh air and enthusiasm .For sure, Europe has definitely been a god send for the life of jazz.

On Miles Davis’ Passing On (written after the funeral 1991)

If I had to sum up Miles Davis in one word, it was timing. For example in the musical sense playing eighth notes directly in the middle of the beat. Or knowing when to hire someone new, just having a feel for change. Even in the dramatic pacing of his life, like those retrospective concerts he performed two months before he died, he knew when to do things—when and who and what to use in his life—and when to bow out….the ultimate producer/director. Everything he did, he did with an incredible sense of timing.

Miles had always been at the edge of the music, staying current, always searching. In the 1980s, when he was in his 50s and 60s, at times his health may have prohibited him from doing too much, but he took the time to do other things than music. He became more outgoing, more willing to share his knowledge and wisdom. He gave many interviews in those last few years and talked openly. He co-authored his biography and got heavily into painting, at a pretty high level by the way. I felt that in his last ten years Miles was acting more like a grand master of the art than he ever had before.

My mother noticed an article in the New York Times in August saying Miles Davis was ill in California with the nature of the illness not disclosed.  For me, he was always in the hospital so that wasn’t alarming. What was scary was to read that his ailment was not reported and that his family would not talk about it.

Miles had been touring all summer right through the end of August. In July he performed two serious events: one produced by Quincy Jones at the Montreux Jazz Festival that celebrated the music that Gil Evans and Miles did together. The other in Paris was even more special: a small group situation that focused on Miles and his former sidemen, from Jackie McLean to Joe Zawinul, Wayne Shorter, John McLaughlin, Jon Scofield and Kenny Garrett, playing things like “All Blues” and “In A Silent Way.” He received the Legion of Honor award from the French….their top award—it was a big summer.

These concerts were truly remarkable. Both would have to be considered retrospective, something Miles had refused to do in the past. When he returned from his hiatus in the ‘80s, he was offered a million dollars from the Japanese to reunite with Herbie, Tony, Ron, and Wayne…..the great second quintet. He wouldn’t do it. Instead it became the group VSOP, with Freddie Hubbard playing trumpet. Miles refused because it wasn’t in his nature to look backward. He looked upon these retrospective events with skepticism.

The day after Miles died there was a concert close to where I live in Pennsylvania  with Keith Jarrett, Jack DeJohnette, and Gary Peacock. It was a really great performance. After the show I went backstage and we were all sitting there shocked. Jack said, “The thing that we all got from him is to: “Stay on course, and don’t let anybody throw you.”  I asked if anyone had heard anything about the funeral. He said, “No.  But they would have to have it in Madison Square Garden.”

That Wednesday, I got a call from Jim Rose in George Wein’s office. He had been Miles’ road manager while I was in the band and for many years after. “It’s an invitation-only memorial service. Can you come?” The service was at St. Peter’s Church on 54th Street and Lexington Avenues where Reverend John Gensel had presided over jazz memorial services for so many jazz players—Coltrane, Monk, etc.  It’s a well-known church, very modern, almost non-denominational. The service was on that Saturday, a week after Miles died.

When I arrived, it felt like Hollywood. The press was lined up outside, lots of limousines. everywhere and so on. Inside, it was like Miles was there. They had gigantic pictures of him playing, receiving the medal from the Knights of Malta, all looking great and smiling.  It was so dramatic. It was also eerie in a way because it’s a large church and they had the speakers on low, playing  “All Blues” and other tunes, while the whole place was hushed.  Everyone was quiet. I was sitting next to Monty Alexander. We just looked at each other and I said, “Oh God, this is so weird.”

I looked around in the room. I’d say there were four or five hundred people—quite a few I didn’t know, and a lot of the musicians from my period with Miles whom I hadn’t seen in twenty years, as well as familiar faces like Jack DeJonette, Wayne Shorter, Dave Holland, and Herbie Hancock. I realized the common bond between all of us was we had been with Miles when we were young and impressionable, not fully formed. For each of us, he had been our first big break. That bonded the fifty or so musicians attending who were lucky to have played with him over the past forty-five years.

David Dinkins, New York’s mayor at the time, was the first of many speakers. He called Miles the quintessential New Yorker, saying that he had had come from East St. Louis to attend Juilliard and lived here all his life. Quincy Jones talked about how Miles was his great idol way back in the ‘40s and 50s. Max Roach spoke about how they’d been together for years and how he helped Miles kick dope. Others talked about his influence, about his personality….how he was good looking, a great dresser, the cars, women, and boxing.  They talked about how charismatic he was.

Bill Cosby, being Mr. Entertainer, was the best. He lightened the atmosphere immediately: “It’s OK to applaud,” he said. “Miles is fine, everything is OK.” Then he told some great stories. He said that news of what Miles did at 3:00 in the morning in a club in New York would get to Philadelphia by 3:30. The cats would all be running around talking about what he wore, what he played, who he hired, who he fired. Bill: “That’s how important he was.”

At one point, Cosby was saying that some people said Miles had AIDS. Then he said, “But in what order? It took fifteen things to knock this guy off.”  It was true. It was an incredible testament to Miles’ strength. He was a frail person in some ways but in more ways he was very strong.  There were always those two sides to him—he was a boxer who he had a hip replacement, sickle cell anemia, diabetes. I heard that seven strokes in a 24-hour period was the final bell.

I would say Jesse Jackson was the best speaker, I had never heard him speak live but immediately you could tell this guy was a trained speaker—loud, a real preacher with a voice like the Force. He gave a written eulogy, finishing with a beautiful poetic analogy for Miles. “He was our music man…blowing out of his horn, out of his soul” and so on. It was extremely uplifting.

Finally, Quincy got back up and said, “I’m going to show a little bit of this Gil Evans film from Montreux.” At first it was so strange.  Miles got up to play, he’s smiling and waving, but there was no sound.  Then the actual performance of “Summertime” came on. He played the melody and one chorus—and that was how the service ended after about one and one-half hours. I am sure everyone feared that it would be disorganized but in the end it was dignified and inspiring. It had not been a circus.

Afterward, everybody hung out, and it kind of cemented the bond between those of us who had actually worked with him. James Williams came by and said, “I guess school is out.” Wayne Shorter had a great smile on his face: “I saw Miles…he visited me… everything is OK.  Don’t worry, everything’s ok.”  I felt that summed up what we all were feeling—which was that Miles left when he wanted to leave. Although he had only been 65, he had lived a good, full life and he checked out at a good time. Look what the man left behind.

I agree with Wayne and Cos. It was not a tragedy—it was really OK. That was how I felt, and that’s how I will feel forever I’m sure.

Miles requested that he be buried next to Duke Ellington in Woodmere Cemetery in the Bronx. I think it’s fitting that they are together because if anyone affected 20th century music through the voice of jazz, it’s definitely those two artists. With a few other cats (Bird, Pops), they are still head and shoulders above everybody for what they accomplished by bringing jazz into the world.

The Complete Transcription Process

by DAVID LIEBMAN

WHY TRANSCRIBE?

How does one learn tone, nuance and develop a true and believable jazz sense of rhythm? Certainly there are exercises and method books which can help a student attain these goals, but there is a built in elusiveness to these concepts since they are virtually impossible to notate in any convincing fashion. The best approach is exact aural and tactile imitation-the first stage of all artistic growth. For jazz, the most valuable form of imitation is a direct master-apprentice relationship in which the live model (master) demonstrates directly to the student demanding immediate and exact repetition until mastered before moving on. Learning in this way becomes a natural outgrowth of constant exposure and reinforcement on the spot. But without that opportunity, I have found transcription is the next best method. Some musicians object to transcribing as stealing other people’s ideas. My contention is that in one way or another, whether it be as detailed as I will describe or as casual as Charlie Parker supposedly standing outside of a club in Kansas City hearing Lester Young and then going home with phrases in his ear and mind to practice and recall, most artists have done something of this sort. And the best players are usually the ones who will tell you immediately that so and so was their main inspiration and they began by copying him. This is a process-a means to an end and to my mind very necessary.

I have a DVD titled “The Improviser’s Guide to Transcription” (Caris Music Services) which describes the process in detail with actual demonstrations. Transcribing involves a three part learning process: body, mind and spirit-in that order. Being an auto didactic system, the process involves a student 100% in their own work with tangible and measurable rewards. If present, the teacher can serve as a guide, but in any case this process can all be accomplished without the aid of an institution. It is exhaustive, complete and very satisfying with results immediately perceived in most cases via an improved time feel and more subtle use of nuance for starters. Transcribing is like learning how to speak a language, similar to the experience of traveling to a foreign country whose language may have been studied in school. Finally a student can hear the way the language is actually used and pronounced rather than written by being immersed in a foreign culture on a day to day basis. The so-called intangibles in jazz, outside of the specific notes and rhythms, cannot be notated exactly. This includes but is not limited to the subtleties of rhythmic feel and how the artist interprets the beat as well as the use of expressive nuance in one’s sound, aspects of which are usually lumped under the word “phrasing.” In transcribing, a musician is forced to hear and duplicate everything. As well, with the notes written out it becomes possible to analyze the thought process of the improviser. This can help the student initiate his or her own ideas and inspire one to go further in their own research.

In my opinion, it is the most efficient and productive technique for learning to improvise in the jazz tradition, or in any tradition for that matter. It is the closest one can come to the age old master apprenticeship system which existed for centuries as the
accepted method for learning the arts and crafts. As mentioned above, transcribing a master is the next best thing to having an accomplished improviser present in real time in front of a student as a model to copy and inspire. Transcription is an unbeatable tool as a means to an end. The end being artistic creation, musical freedom and hopefully, a recognizable style of playing. Knowing what came before is the only way to realize what there is left to do. Imitation as a stage of learning is timeless and inevitable.

THREE PART PROCESS

In general the three part process involves at first saturated listening to the chosen solo with the first goal being to sing along in scat fashion. A student should arrive at the point that with or without the recording playing he can reasonably sing the solo. The
important musical skill acquired and honed in this process is pitch control without the crutch of the instrument at hand, which will come later. This also reinforces a strong sense of rhythm as we expect the student to keep the correct pulse without the aid of a metronome or having the recorded version to reference at all while singing.
Next is the time consuming process of writing out and playing the solo. In some cases, depending upon the proposed solo and individual skills of the student, the exact sequence of events can be changed accordingly, meaning learning the solo first on the
instrument followed by notation. But in any case the goals are exact duplication of every aspect of the solo including all nuances besides the pitches as well as having it written down accurately. It is in this stage of imitating the solo that the acquisition of subtleties such as tone color, nuance, variations of time feel, etc., is subconsciously absorbed, not to mention improved technique. It’s like a reservoir being filled for eventual use by the student in the real world of his own playing. This is the most important stage. There should be little or no difference to one’s ears between the original and the student’s version when this stage is completed.

Vaughn Stoffey plays Dave Liebman solo on “Impressions” 

PDF of Lieb’s solo on “Impressions” by Vaughn Stoffey

Jessica Lee playing a Joe Lovano on “Passion Dance”

Berklee student Hailey Niswanger playing along with part of my Fancy Free solo from “Live At The Lighthouse ” with Elvin Jones (1972)

Guitarist Chris Guilfoyle (son of Irish bassist/composer Ronan Guilfoyle) playing Coltrane’s “Nite Has 1000 Eyes”

Pianist So Young Park from the Master’s Program at Manhattan School of Music singing AND playing (at the same time) a very hard and uptempo solo…Herbie Hancock on “Milestones” from Live at the Plugged Nickel  (Miles Davis seminal live recording).

Berklee Global Jazz Institute student from Palestine playing the NAY with Trane on Bye, Bye Blackbird-incredible!!

Aside from the obvious technical rewards of having to carefully and accurately notate the specifics of rhythm and pitch, I have the student write out the solo so that it can be analyzed and used for further study. This third part of the process is where, depending upon the solo, a certain amount of harmonic and possibly compositional knowledge may be necessary for understanding what was played. Certainly a teacher can be of benefit at this point with their experience. The goal here is to first try and understand the thinking, rationale and concept of the improviser under study as much as can be deduced after the fact about an improvisation. Though there are of course inexplicable events which occur musically, with analysis at least some patterns and repetitive ideas reflecting the thinking process of the artist in question can be discerned.
To digress for a moment, the uninitiated might consider improvisation in jazz as what it appears to be-completely spontaneous and in the moment. But we know that what is actually being played (outside rare moments of fresh inspiration) is a result of habit and experience to a large degree, albeit cast in the moment. Though one’s phrasing may alter from idea to idea or day to day depending upon the player’s temperament and response in relation to the surroundings, audience, venue, accompanists and more, the content itself will be less sensitive to change. Of course content hopefully evolves with time as in the case of great innovators like John Coltrane, Duke Ellington and Miles Davis whose styles changed monumentally in different ways over varied amounts of years. For other artists it may be more gradual and at a slower rate. In any case this analysis procedure is crucial to
understanding the intellectual component of the musical material being played. What are we specifically looking for in the analysis stage? A short list might include specifics of scales and chord types used, melodic motifs and their variations, overall structure of the solo in regards to both content and emotion, rhythmic diversity, uses of patterns and other repetitive devices, passages of lyricism versus harmonic complexity and much more. We are trying to put ourselves into the mind of the improviser who is far removed from present time without any concrete idea of what was on his mind that day. This “second guessing” can have far reaching consequences for the student.

Following this analysis we get more involved with the tools that were discovered. The student isolates melodic lines which belong to certain harmonic progressions, at first those that are most common in jazz like the II-V-1 or I-V1-II-V, etc., and then compose
variations that still retain the integrity and core of that particular chosen line. Also with the aid of a teacher if needed we try to sort out qualitative differences between lines that were played. For example noticing the differences between those lines that used only chord tones or blues notes compared to more complex examples using harmonic substitutions and more. In other words we try to develop within a student an objective way to judge the musical sophistication of a line in order to get his mind and ear up to a level of knowing the difference between merely good lines and great ones. Criteria such as contour, rhythmic variation, varied pitch choices are some elements that are involved in these evaluations. The student should choose some of the better lines to use as models for composing variations as well as transposing them to other keys and tempos. Other extended exercises consist of taking lines from different sections of the solos and cross referencing them, in a sense constructing several alternative versions of the original material. Also I will have the student compose several “perfect” choruses, meaning within the style using the best material that he has developed in the line variation exercises. Then of course the student must play spontaneously with a rhythm track or accompanist (even with drums only) in the style of the original solo but using his own material, which by now should be considerable. By the way, vocalists and percussionists should also be doing some form of this transcription process. All of this work will hopefully result in absorption of the feeling and content of the solo. The student has not only observed what was played but after spending so much time with the solo should naturally feel akin to the spirit and temperament of the soloist him or herself. This in-depth study can be revealing on many levels. There is something very honest and validating about studying the past in this manner. It gives a student a sense of being connected to the tradition and of having earned his or her way.

WHAT SOLOS / WHICH ARTISTS (THE TREE METAPHOR)

For the first solo the student will probably spend a few months involving several hours a day to go through the entire process. This will speed up with each solo. A student can eventually work concurrently on several solos possibly singing one while playing another and analyzing a third. With this much commitment it is important that the correct choices of material and soloist be carefully thought about for the obvious reason of maximizing time.
It is beneficial to have the student transcribe material that can be of practical use in the future. For example, transcribing a blues, rhythm changes and well known standards will be of more benefit at this stage than an original tune played only by a particular artist. At the least what will be gleaned from the process will be of use in the real playing world on these types of tunes which are so common in the repertoire. Concerning which artists to transcribe I have found that the metaphor of a tree is an effective tool in trying to organize the prodigious amount of recorded history available for a student to discover. Where does a student begin?
A tree has six parts: root, trunk, limb, branches, twigs and leaves. As we progress up a tree we get further away from the source which are the actual roots in the ground. In any field of endeavor there is a similar historical architecture. Simply put, without the roots (originators) there would be no further story; the trunk symbolizes the main sources of discovery and stylization; the limbs are people who created their own direction stemming from the sources and spawning a whole other area; whereas the branches go off in their own singular direction. Twigs are less dramatic developments while leaves fall to the ground each season to be forgotten. If we trace the history of jazz or even just the saxophone or piano for example we could have some very interesting discussions filling in parts of this metaphorical tree. Suffice to say, if we had unlimited time it would be best to transcribe from the root up but this is not realistic. So I urge my students to begin with the bebop tree and work their way through hard bop into modal and free jazz meaning the music of the 1950s and 1960s for the most part, a period rich in recordings and innovations. What we are after at the beginning stages of transcription is a solo with good eighth note lines and a great rhythmic feel. There are abundant examples on blues, rhythm changes and standards to choose from during the recommended historical period. The student should choose a solo that he loves and if he could, would play tomorrow. This is important in order to keep inspiration fresh. I don’t choose a solo for my students but I direct them to the group of artists who would fit under the guidelines described. The solo need not be complex or fast. It should be something challenging but not so much above the student that it will frustrate him. Early Miles Davis through “Kind of Blue” is a great place to start as is Chet Baker, Dexter Gordon, Wynton Kelly, Wes Montgomery and others of that ilk. Beginning on the student’s home own instrument at first is advisable because at least pitch recognition will be more directly related to this familiar sound and sonority of his instrument. Eventually other instruments are important to transcribe because the technical aspects of transferring material to one’s own instrument will challenge the student to come up with different responses, fingerings and techniques hopefully all aimed at trying to be free of cliches.

 

HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH

With any massive study project it is important to see a light at the end of the tunnel. After a few transcriptions most students feel really great about the undertaking and certainly sound better at least on the tunes they transcribed and probably on a lot of similar material. A tremendous sense of reinforcement and accomplishment is felt. But there is a danger of using transcription as a source of ideas rather as a means to an end. After all, the goal as an artist is to find an individual voice. There is a point where it isn’t artistically honest to keep using other people’s material, even with the transformation process described in detail below. My recommendation is that students transcribe a blues, rhythm changes, a standard, a modal and free tune with possibly a few more of particular interest. But in any case two years is the maximum amount of time one should transcribe, assuming it is done as described. As stated, when the process speeds up and becomes routine the student will be able to devote less hours to transcription and return to other studies. Selective transcription on the other hand goes on forever. That is taking off a few bars or chorus of something that intrigues you. The same goes for all the transcription books available in that they should be used like an encyclopedia for reference, sight reading and to satisfy one’s curiosity.
In summary, transcription involves three basic areas of our musical faculties:
1. Notation through saturated listening to the selected solo, the student internalizes (by singing at first) the notes and undertakes the painstaking, necessary craft of notating the rhythms and pitches of the solo.
2. Playing – with repeated instrumental practice, the solo is exactly imitated in every way, including dynamics, articulation, nuance, time feel, tone coloring and of course, the rhythms and pitches.
3. Analysis – using the classic methods of theme and variation study, motivic analysis and form structure concepts, etc., the student deduces to the best of his ability the thought processes represented in the work. By isolating passages and phrases, learning them in different keys and tempos, creating variations and using them in other comparable harmonic situations, the student begins to transform the transcription process from imitation to creation.

 

Specific Tools For Practicing Transcriptions

Playing and duplicating the solo

1. Use half speed for practicing synchronization with the original as well as for study of nuance and expressive techniques used. For symbols used in the transcriptions, refer to the “Definition of Symbols”.

2. Eventually, try to play the solo along with the original at regular speed.

3. After playing with the original, play without using a metronome, with an accompanist, or a play-along of the same track to check how well you know it. You can even make your own play-along on a cassette.

4. Play the solo in different keys and tempos.

5. Use the solo as a point of departure to improvise on your own within the chord progression. Stay close to the style and feel of the original but initiate your own thoughts.

Creating your own ideas

1. Extract a line, pattern, motif and transpose it to other keys and tempos.

2. Categorizing, transposing and composing original lines. Put all the lines that are from the same progression or chord change type on one page. This is to see the similarities and differences when a soloist encounters a specific chord or progression. With the help of an experienced musician choose the “best” lines using criteria of choice of notes, rhythmic interest and overall shape. See “John Coltrane’s I-VI-ii-V Sequences….as well as “Coltrane ii-V Lines…(below)

Picture_2 Picture_3The following example begins with an original line of Dexter Gordon’s followed by a student’s variations. The idea is to pick the most interesting lines, transpose them, play them at different tempos and insert them into your own improvisations.
Dexter Gordon Line and Variations - Tenor Sax-page-001
A. Transpose it to other keys and play/memorize it at different tempos. Put the line into a tune at the same harmonic place.
B. Place it at the top of a page and write variations using typical theme and variation techniques (augmentation, diminution, syncopation, sequence change, displacement both melodically and rhythmically, neighboring tones, etc.). Do these “new lines” in other keys and at other tempos. Try to place them in other contexts where the same progression appears. See “ii-V Variations-Shorter and Longer (below).

Picture_4 Picture_6

 

3. Use a graph of the solo written out horizontally with all the same bars lined up vertically from the top of the page down. In this manner, you can see what was played on each chorus in a particular bar. By skipping around between choruses, you can create new and unique combinations from what the soloist did. See”Transcription Graph” below.

Picture_7 Picture_8

Example A #1-6 – This represents Charlie Parkers first 4 bars from his original solo on confirmation (6 choruses).
Example B – These are possible lines made up of a bar of different choruses with original bars interjected by the student.
Example B #1 – Bar 1 from Charlie Parkers (Birds) chorus. Bar 2 is taken from bar 2 of Bird’s 3rd chorus (B.C.3 = Bird Chorus 3). Bar 3 is also taken from Birds 3rd chorus, while the 4th bar is an original idea from the student.
Example B #2 – This time there are no original ideas from the student, but bars 1 and 2 are taken from Bird’s 5th chorus, and bars 3 and 4 are taken from Bird’s 4th chorus.
Example B #3 – Here bars 1 and 3 are taken from Bird’s 4th chorus, while bars 2 and 4 are original ideas from the student.
Example B #4 – Bar 1 is taken from Bird’s 2nd chorus and bar 4 is taken from Bird’s 5th chorus. Bars 2 and 3 are original ideas from the student.

4. Compose an original solo.

By the time you are done with all of the above, not only will everything be naturally memorized, but the process of internalizing will have begun. This means that what you practice today find its way into your playing without having to think about it in the near future. Depending upon the material, its difficulty and your ability to absorb the information, this process can take anywhere from a few weeks to a few months, but you can be sure that eventually it will occur if you have done the work.

Picture_9 Picture_10

Suggested Solos (from the 60s/late 50s-some of my personal favorites):
Adderley, Cannonball: Milestones (Milestones-Miles Davis)
Coleman, George: Autumn Leaves (Miles In Europe) Stella By Starlight (My Funny Valentine)
Coltrane: Softly As In A Morning (Live at the Village Vanguard); So What (Kind of Blue-Miles Davis); Oleo (Cookin’ with the Miles Davis Quintet); Blue Trane (Blue Trane-J.Coltrane); Impressions (Impressions J.Coltrane); Resolution (A Love Supreme- J.Coltrane)
Corea, Chick – Matrix (Now He Sings, Now He Sobs-C.Corea)
Davis, Miles – Bye Bye Blackbird (Round Midnight-M.Davis); So What and Freddie Freeloader (Kind of Blue-M.Davis)
Hancock, Herbie – Autumn Leaves (Miles in Europe-M.Davis)
Mobley, Hank: Pfrancing (Someday My Prince Will Come-Miles Davis); No Blues (Miles Live at Carnegie Hall)
Powell, Bud: Cherokee (Genius of Bud Powell)
Rollins, Sonny: It Could Happen To You (Sound of Sonny-S.Rollins); Sonny Moon For Two (Night at the Village Vanguard-S.Rollins) Surrey With the Fringe On the Top (Newk’s Time-S.Rollins) Tenor Madness(Tenor Madness-S.Rollins)
Shorter, Wayne: Speak No Evil (Speak No Evil-W.Shorter); 81 (ESP-Miles Davis)
Stitt, Sonny: No Greater Love (Boss Tenors-G.Ammons and S.Stitt); Eternal Triangle (Eternal Triangle-Gillespie, Rollins, Stitt)
Tristano, Lennie: Line Up (Lennie Tristano); East 32nd St (The Complete Lennie Tristano)
Tyner, McCoy: Night and Day(Inner Urge-Joe Henderson);Passion Dance(The Real McCoy M.Tyner); Speak Low (Inception-M.Tyner); Pursuance(Love Supreme- J.Coltrane)

The “Ideal” Jazz Education-short summary

by DAVID LIEBMAN

The “ideal” jazz education would obviously include technical matters meaning the vocabulary of music in general: scales, chords, keyboard knowledge, the technical aspects of instrumental playing (with some classical technique also), the specifics of jazz concerning history, repertoire, ensemble playing, big band participation, writing and arranging. Alongside this obvious musical training, the business of music must be included meaning the realities of performing and teaching as a way to make a living. Finally, and most important should be aesthetics involving readings etc., in order to recognize what art is in other manifestations besides music along with the great philosophical as well as spiritual matters that a human being who aspires to be a conduit for deep feelings and thoughts should be aware of. In summary, it is the development and evolution of the total “artist” that should be the focal point of the “ideal” jazz education.